You are reading

State AG Sues New York Sports Clubs And Lucille Roberts For Charging ‘Illegal Dues’ During Pandemic

New York Sports Clubs in Rego Park (Photo: NYSC)

Oct. 1, 2020 By Christian Murray

The parent company of New York Sports Clubs and Lucille Roberts has been hit with a lawsuit by the New York Attorney General for illegally charging its members while its gyms were closed.

Letitia James, the NY Attorney General, accused Town Sports International of violating the law by charging its members while its gyms were forced to shut down–and for failing to reimburse them when they reopened.

Additionally, the company, which operates nearly 100 gyms in the state under the NYSC and Lucille Roberts brand names, is accused of making it extremely difficult and costly for members to cancel.

“Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, NYSC and Lucille Roberts have done everything possible to flout their obligations and take advantage of members,” Attorney General James said. “Time and again, these gyms have illegally sought to lift up their precarious financial state at their members’ expenses, even though many of these very members were simultaneously being crushed under the weight of financial hardships.”

There are six NYSCs in Queens, with locations in Astoria, Forest Hills, Glendale, Rego Park, Sunnyside and Whitestone. In addition, there are three Lucille Roberts in the borough, with locations in Astoria, Flushing and Forest Hills.

Since the coronavirus shutdown in mid-March, James’ office has received 1,848 complaints across the state about the company, according to court documents. The suit said that 437 of those complaints have come since Sept. 1.

The company, James said, charged its members in April despite gyms being ordered shut on March 16.

TSI stopped charging fees on April 8, following a letter from James, and promised that its members would receive credits in the future.

The company started charging its members again on Sept. 1, soon after some gyms in the state were permitted to reopen.

James said that the company did not reimburse its members for the period between March 16 and April 8. Furthermore, many members who were charged in September lived in areas where the gyms had not reopened.

The club is also accused of providing false information to consumers who tried to freeze or cancel their memberships. Many were told they were subject to a 45-day advance notice and there was a $10 or $15 cancellation processing fee.

But James said that gym members are permitted to cancel their membership without charge when services are no longer available due to a substantial change in operation.

Monthly dues for these gyms range from $20 to $150, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit, filed Sept. 30, is calling on the court to force the company to reimburse its members for the period between March 16 to April 8; to stop charging members whose gyms are shut; to allow members to cancel at no charge; and to pay restitution.

TSI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

One Comment

Click for Comments 
Ali. Abdalla.

Ok this is something new to me I know my company charge me and all other weekly dues. ( limousine company ) Under the name of protection. Your franchise ( I buy the franchise. On 2004 but on 2008. The market collapse ) the franchise since then As. 0. But the dues. Always taken never stop. When I asked a The company owner how you charge $54 weekly to protect. Zero He always say this is what is it is this is legal ?

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Op-Ed | Hochul: Action is Imperative on Shoplifting, but Violent Crime is Just Fine

Apr. 29, 2024 By Council Member James F. Gennaro

Negotiations regarding the New York State budget have just concluded a few days ago and a budget has passed after more than two weeks of delays. But while Gov. Kathy Hochul has proclaimed this year’s ‘bold agenda’ aims to make New York ‘safer,’ there hasn’t been so much as a whisper about the safety issue New Yorkers actually care about – New York States’s dangerous bail reform laws and the State’s absence of a ‘dangerousness standard,’ which would allow judges to detain without bail those defendants that pose a present a clear and present danger to our communities. (The 49 other states and the federal government have a dangerousness standard. NY State is the only state that lacks this essential protection from the State’s most dangerous offenders.)

After crackdown on street vendors, CM Moya announces return of multi-agency Roosevelt Avenue Task Force

Council Member Francisco Moya led a walk-through along Roosevelt Avenue in Corona with representatives from nearly a dozen city agencies to point out quality-of-life issues that have affected residents and business owners for too long, including the proliferation of massage parlors, unregulated street vending and uncleanliness.

Following the tour, Moya announced he is re-establishing the Roosevelt Avenue Task Force, a multi-agency effort to tackle pressing concerns that was initially created in 1991 but has faltered in recent years.