You are reading

Op-Ed: Development Disasters In Waiting

Wet weather discharge point sign taken in Long Island City (Photo: Julia Forman)

March 11, 2021 Op-Ed By: Julia Forman

It’s no secret that in parts of Long Island City, our neighbors can’t flush their toilet during heavy rainfall. That’s because of a sewage system that was designed for the smaller population living here more than half a century’s worth of development ago.

Why are we trying to bring in new residents when the old residents can’t flush their toilets in a thunderstorm? Why are we building luxury towers if we can’t even afford to provide basic, quality of life essentials to the people who live here now?

And while District 26 has plenty of transportation options, from subway lines to bus routes and an increasing number of bike lanes, the truth is that nearly all of those options are operating over their intended capacity.

It’s become popular to categorize anyone who opposes any proposed development as a NIMBY, so I want to make something clear. I want housing in my backyard. I want development in my backyard. I want anything that can help make life better and more affordable for the people who are already in our neighborhoods in my backyard. But none of that is possible without addressing the infrastructure currently on the brink of catastrophic failure in Western Queens’ 26th Council District.

Anybody who has spent a rush hour waiting at Queens Plaza, Queensboro Plaza, or Court Square (respectively ranked 107, 105, and 53 out of 472 for volume of passengers) knows their grim, tight-as-sardine nature at peak times. Who hasn’t stood on a crowded platform, with a pinch of nervousness about ending up on the tracks? Even before Covid-19, these conditions were untenable.

When luxury developers are touting our transportation system as a selling point, they aren’t selling the reality that my neighbors and I are living in. They’re selling a fantasy version of the system that our city’s and state’s leaders have been unwilling to maintain as the population of Western Queens booms.

Julia Forman (Photo: votejulia.com)

District 26 is also home to the second most crowded school district in Queens. While a recent luxury development effort offered to include three new schools, they would only have added capacity for children of the new residents, resolving none of the existing shortage.

This, like so many solutions proposed by developers, is simply treading water. It might keep your head above water for now, but you’d better hope for something better to come along.

It’s time to do more than hope.

When people move into our area for a nice new home, we want them to become a part of the community. That means we want them to be able to flush their toilets. We want them to be able to catch a train without body-surfing at Queensboro Plaza. And we want them to send their children to community schools where their children have a desk and a locker and aren’t fighting for the attention of an overburdened teacher. We want them to come out for Open Streets and Open Culture and we want them to spend their money at local businesses – because that’s what a community does.

As City Council member for District 26, I promise to work with city officials and prospective developers to ensure that our sanitation, transportation, and education needs are met before any more large-scale luxury development can be approved. I promise to make sure we have housing options available for all of our neighbors, regardless of their income. I promise to hold those seeking luxury development accountable and responsible for the quality of life of our whole community, and to bring Western Queens infrastructure that actually meets the needs of our neighbors.

I promise to fight for all of us.

Julia Forman is a city council candidate running to represent District 26, which covers Sunnyside, Woodside, Long Island City and a portion of Astoria

email the author: news@queenspost.com

One Comment

Click for Comments 
Larry Penner

Record construction in Long Island City has not been accompanied significant increases in transit capacity to accommodate thousands of new residents The same is true for commuters to jobs in LIC.

There are opportunities to increase capacity and service by running trains more frequently on the #7 line. Until the 1980’s, there was Manhattan bound express service till 12:30 PM. Flushing bound express service began after 1 PM. There has been no express service between 10 AM and 3 PM due to periodic ongoing track, power, signal, and routine maintenance projects for decades.

There is always equipment used primarily for rush hour peak service that is available to provide additional off peak service It is a question of finding funding to cover operating costs for additional service.

Why not extend many of the Long Island Rail Road trains currently terminating at Hunters Point during AM rush hour to LIC? Turn trains around to provide reverse commuter service. In the PM rush hour, start all trains from LIC instead of Hunters Point. Establish new off peak, mid day, evening and weekend service between LIC and Jamaica.

New ferry services can accommodate a limited number of riders. Many new residents and employees need the subway to access employment, educational, medical and entertainment opportunities in Manhattan and other boroughs. The continued economic success of new business and residents coming to LIC is dependent upon not only additional transportation capacity, but capital improvements to sewer, water, electrical and utility assets as well. Municipal fire, police and sanitation services also have to be expanded. What is the cost and who will pay for all these additional capital improvements and services?

(Larry Penner is a transportation advocate, historian and writer who previously worked for the Federal Transit Administration Region 2 NY Office.)

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Fatal chain-reaction crash on Kosciuszko Bridge in Maspeth claims life of 75-year-old Texan: NYPD

New details have emerged into the fatal chain-reaction four-vehicle collision on the Kosciuszko Bridge in Maspeth that killed a senior and injured seven on Thursday morning.

The 75-year-old man who was killed during the pile-up has been identified as Shafiur Rahman of Euless, Texas. He was among several passengers riding in a 2021 Honda HRV that was trying to merge into the rain-soaked southbound Brooklyn-Queens Expressway.